






















I thought of Sentinels the minute I saw the Sword deck...too much similarity, just like his last deck, where the backs were like the Rebels deck...guess he is a fan of T11vasta41 wrote:The sword through the ace back design is very similar to the Sentinels:



Lots of decks go on sale after kickstarter campaigns. GW has sales, TOM has sales from stocks from project owners. I don't think having a sale is punching the backers in the face...chunksmyhero wrote:If you missed out on the previous deck, he's having an $8 sale on his Youtube channel.
Which is a punch in the face to everyone who supported his suspiciously funded campaign if you ask me. Which he did, and then he deleted my response and sent me a personal follow up which I won't get in to, as it's what you imagine.
So .. there's that.


Right - but this had suspicious funding IIRC, like a $5k boost in one day with no deck pledges to support.4.of.Clubs wrote:Lots of decks go on sale after kickstarter campaigns. GW has sales, TOM has sales from stocks from project owners. I don't think having a sale is punching the backers in the face...chunksmyhero wrote:If you missed out on the previous deck, he's having an $8 sale on his Youtube channel.
Which is a punch in the face to everyone who supported his suspiciously funded campaign if you ask me. Which he did, and then he deleted my response and sent me a personal follow up which I won't get in to, as it's what you imagine.
So .. there's that.


I agree. The whole corner area would be much better cleaned up.sprouts1115 wrote:The indices should line up with the courts and pips. This is not a playable deck.

Not to mention his responses to valid questions and concerns from potential backers/customers are extremely rude and immature.chunksmyhero wrote:Right - but this had suspicious funding IIRC, like a $5k boost in one day with no deck pledges to support.4.of.Clubs wrote:Lots of decks go on sale after kickstarter campaigns. GW has sales, TOM has sales from stocks from project owners. I don't think having a sale is punching the backers in the face...chunksmyhero wrote:If you missed out on the previous deck, he's having an $8 sale on his Youtube channel.
Which is a punch in the face to everyone who supported his suspiciously funded campaign if you ask me. Which he did, and then he deleted my response and sent me a personal follow up which I won't get in to, as it's what you imagine.
So .. there's that.
So if he pushed this over the finish in order to collect $13 pledges, then turn around and bulk sell for $8 -- that's a nut punch. Will not support this on principal now.






Oh you mean the vjose32 deck that was absolute garbage? Or should I say Veeve, Mason Deming, Jeriholic, or any other fake name you use to talk trash about hard working individuals that actually produce something?jerichoholic wrote:Not a fan of these. Personally I think there should be a level playing field with all card projects on KS. If this one tried funding with a USPC printing goal, it wouldn't fund. This would help weed out the crappier decks on KS and only the good would get funded.


I personally don't like this deck either, but to be fair, jerichoholic didn't give any suggestions, he just called it a crappy deck.ecNate wrote:Congratulations, you just lost a fan. I really enjoyed your music, kind of liked your first deck, and I also backed both. I also previously defended you and would have offered suggestions and considered your future work. Your attacks here ruined that. I don't know what you wanted to prove, but you made things worse and are just making yourself angry and negatively impacting your own personal health.
This concept of if you can't do better yourself don't criticize is ridiculous. I sure you hope you never criticize a meal at a restaurant, poor service, said a TV show or movie wasn't for you, etc. There are actually very few trolls here, but if there are why feed them?
I honestly hope you will grow from this and learn to separate the trolls from those who just have an opinion and more importantly from those that actually want to help you improve. Sadly I fear you'll just now attack me.

He just implied it was "not good", which is still simply his opinion that he can freely state. It's not kind or helpful, but it doesn't break any rules and certainly doesn't warrant an outburst like that.4.of.Clubs wrote:I personally don't like this deck either, but to be fair, jerichoholic didn't give any suggestions, he just called it a crappy deck.ecNate wrote:Congratulations, you just lost a fan. I really enjoyed your music, kind of liked your first deck, and I also backed both. I also previously defended you and would have offered suggestions and considered your future work. Your attacks here ruined that. I don't know what you wanted to prove, but you made things worse and are just making yourself angry and negatively impacting your own personal health.
This concept of if you can't do better yourself don't criticize is ridiculous. I sure you hope you never criticize a meal at a restaurant, poor service, said a TV show or movie wasn't for you, etc. There are actually very few trolls here, but if there are why feed them?
I honestly hope you will grow from this and learn to separate the trolls from those who just have an opinion and more importantly from those that actually want to help you improve. Sadly I fear you'll just now attack me.

First of all I didn't say your deck was crap or garbage, never said that about any of your decks. I was simply referring to other decks on kickstarter. Second of all I have no idea who Mason Deming is, but it isn't me. I've only ever had 2 accounts on Kickstarter, jerichoholic and veeve, and don't even use the latter anymore. Please don't make snap accusations like this. Obviously i'm not the only one who isn't a fan of yours, ever think of that?UnTiedStates wrote:Oh you mean the vjose32 deck that was absolute garbage? Or should I say Veeve, Mason Deming, Jeriholic, or any other fake name you use to talk trash about hard working individuals that actually produce something?jerichoholic wrote:Not a fan of these. Personally I think there should be a level playing field with all card projects on KS. If this one tried funding with a USPC printing goal, it wouldn't fund. This would help weed out the crappier decks on KS and only the good would get funded.






Users browsing this forum: Adamthinks, Bing [Bot] and 160 guests