Encarded wrote:Call me old and curmudgeony if you want, but in the three years I've worked in this market the discernment of collectors has tanked and it's all about "completion syndrome" and not about art or history.
I appreciate the designs you've created so far and I think the success you've had with your decks until now is well deserved. What I don't really get is how the success of Zach's Fontaine decks is really hurting anyone. The people who buy his decks know exactly what to expect and they buy it because they probably liked the last two versions. I don't really see any other reason to buy something than because either you want to try it out or you know what you get and you want it. I think that the majority of the people who complain about his success are not really in his target group anyways. Not every deck of cards nowadays is made to be collected. About the recolored versions he's doing: I don't see how this is hurting anyone either. Nobody forces anyone to buy a recolored version of a deck they didn't really like in the first place. But it seems like enough people actually appreciate the recolors and if they do, then they buy it, receive it and they're happy because they received exactly what they paid for.
(@Encarded, from here on I'm not addressing you directly anymore. The addressed people know who they are.)
Just because a product you don't like is successful, doesn't mean you need to complain about it. In fact it just comes off as being jealous. I'll take Jackson Robinson as an example for myself here: I don't personally like his decks really much. I don't own a single one of them. I appreciate the effort put into the design and I can clearly understand why people would like it but the decks just don't do it for me. I'm not saying the are ugly, but I just can't see myself using them at all. And that's what I do with cards: I use them to do cardistry. Now, am I angry about Jackson being successful with his decks just because I don't personally like the products he put out? Not at all. In facet, just like with Zach, I'm happy that it worked out for him and that there are enough people who really like his products.
The playing card market has grown a lot in the last few years and I think there's room for a lot of different styles of playing cads now. Collectors are not the only group of people who are targeted by brands anymore, not every deck is made for everyone and because of that, not everyone will like every single new deck on the market, that's normal. But I never understood the hate about recolors. Just because it's not an entirely new design doesn't make the deck a bad deck. I know for myself that when I see a new deck that I don't really like, my only reaction is to ignore it. As long as the targeted group is happy with a deck, be it a recolor or an entirely new design, it will sell, and I don't see a problem here. In my opinion, if someone is able to sell something that seems to have no effort put into it (which is what a lot of people here seem to think the fontaines are) then that person is someone to look up to from a marketing perspective. Those "fanboys" who buy Zach's decks "blindly" (or maybe just because they like it) are not hurting anybody and if it works out for Zach then good for him. The market is big enough for more than one target group to exist and Zach definitely doesn't need everyone in the playing card community to like him or his decks.