USPCC decks - Is Bee stiffer/thicker than Bicycle?
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 12:07 am
I'm trying to figure out some of the differences between USPCC produced decks.
1. Are Bee branded decks stiffer/thicker than Bicycle branded decks?
As I understand it, USPCC offers three choices of paper stock: Bicycle Standard, Bee Casino, or Thin Crush. The Bee Casino grade stock is considered to be slightly thicker, stiffer, and more durable than the Bicycle stock, and can require some breaking in. But are the normal "Bee" branded decks published on Bee Casino stock, or are they published with Bicycle Standard stock, i.e. they don't handle any differently than a standard Bicycle deck?
2. What "finish/coating" does USPCC put on their mass produced Bicycle branded rider-back decks?
From what I've been able to find out, USPCC uses two different coatings, "Magic Finish" (called "Performance Coating" by Ellusionist), and "Standard Finish". The "Magic Finish" is apparently slightly more slippery and makes cards slide more easily, and preferred by magicians and cardists, while the "Standard Finish" coating is only used on orders of 15,000+. On differently branded decks, the Standard Finish is sometimes called "Air-Cushion finish" (Bicycle decks), "Linoid finish" (Tally Ho decks), or "Cambric finish" (Bee decks), which in reality are all identical. So is it true that the normal Bicycle Rider-backs just have the "Standard Finish" rather than the "Magic Finish"? If so, how do the Bicycle Rider-backs handle differently than say the decks with Magic Finish, like the ones USPCC produces for Ellusionist?
Obviously these questions have much broader application to custom playing cards. As I gather, most custom decks produced by USPCC have the "Magic Finish", and are produced on either the Bicycle Standard stock, or the Bee Casino stock.
1. Are Bee branded decks stiffer/thicker than Bicycle branded decks?
As I understand it, USPCC offers three choices of paper stock: Bicycle Standard, Bee Casino, or Thin Crush. The Bee Casino grade stock is considered to be slightly thicker, stiffer, and more durable than the Bicycle stock, and can require some breaking in. But are the normal "Bee" branded decks published on Bee Casino stock, or are they published with Bicycle Standard stock, i.e. they don't handle any differently than a standard Bicycle deck?
2. What "finish/coating" does USPCC put on their mass produced Bicycle branded rider-back decks?
From what I've been able to find out, USPCC uses two different coatings, "Magic Finish" (called "Performance Coating" by Ellusionist), and "Standard Finish". The "Magic Finish" is apparently slightly more slippery and makes cards slide more easily, and preferred by magicians and cardists, while the "Standard Finish" coating is only used on orders of 15,000+. On differently branded decks, the Standard Finish is sometimes called "Air-Cushion finish" (Bicycle decks), "Linoid finish" (Tally Ho decks), or "Cambric finish" (Bee decks), which in reality are all identical. So is it true that the normal Bicycle Rider-backs just have the "Standard Finish" rather than the "Magic Finish"? If so, how do the Bicycle Rider-backs handle differently than say the decks with Magic Finish, like the ones USPCC produces for Ellusionist?
Obviously these questions have much broader application to custom playing cards. As I gather, most custom decks produced by USPCC have the "Magic Finish", and are produced on either the Bicycle Standard stock, or the Bee Casino stock.