UnitedCardists.com - The forum for Cardistry, Magic, Custom Decks and All Things Playing Cards.

STLBluesNut wrote:Will we see a return of nsfw and dual courts? I suppose the theme does not lend itself well to the nsfw part, but I really like those features you put into the special decks.

Sent from my Galaxy 8 using Tapatalk

NSFW Yes, Doube courts no (for this time)

Electus will have few female figures with partial nudity - it will reveal the secrets of the Order "Upper party".

As you probably saw in the ads, I consider the whole Order project a "mature" one due to the adult theme. Even if I think that 1984 novel should be taught in every school.

A little sneak peek

These definitely look great! Could the regular versions have at least embossing or something like Odissea? Not the standard glossy like Betrayers?

I am looking forward to seeing all of this theme.

Sent from my Galaxy 8 using Tapatalk

STLBluesNut wrote:Could the regular versions have at least embossing or something like Odissea? Not the standard glossy like Betrayers?

+1 These decks especially deserve all the bells and whistles

For now, the plan is keep the standard editions simple and the Electus Versions with bell and whistles.
But let's see - if some stretch goals will be reached, I might evaluate to upgrade all the decks.

That would be awesome! Thank you.

Sent from my Galaxy 8 using Tapatalk

I certainly wouldn't consider a female chest NSFW, there is no difference between male and female chests apart from some fat deposits (see: men lactating), and not even that when it comes to the heavier guys with manboobs. If female chests are sexual then so are male, and if male chests aren't sexual then neither are female, we need to fight against the toxic heteronormative double standards still rampant in our society.

Well, that's my spiel done lol. I'm really looking forward to this project and loving this new direction!

Adonael wrote:I certainly wouldn't consider a female chest NSFW, there is no difference between male and female chests apart from some fat deposits (see: men lactating), and not even that when it comes to the heavier guys with manboobs. If female chests are sexual then so are male, and if male chests aren't sexual then neither are female, we need to fight against the toxic heteronormative double standards still rampant in our society.

Well, that's my spiel done lol. I'm really looking forward to this project and loving this new direction!

Give this person some female chests, Gio!

Adonael wrote:we need to fight against the toxic heteronormative double standards still rampant in our society.

We need to fight the ORDER! REVOLUTIO! (now I need a raised fist emoji )

@Adonael - I totally agree But since I design for a lot of people of different cultures, I prefer warn about a possible NSFW / mature content to avoid to offend someone.
Of course I am aware that 90% of the people I design for is open minded and educated, so I don't think they would care too much. However, better be safe than sorry

@Shiro56 - Dear Citizen, the Ministry of Protection needs to talk you privately. (sorry for being silly)

A side note - As you probably noticed, "freedom" is probably the most important value for me. A world ruled by Order is my worst nightmare, and this project is totally against any form of oppression and totalitarism.

I like how the chains are broken on the cover of the Revolutio Deck. That is a nice touch. Lots of neat details as usual.

shiroo56 wrote:We need to fight the ORDER! REVOLUTIO! (now I need a raised fist emoji )

Here you are!

masagin303 wrote:

shiroo56 wrote:We need to fight the ORDER! REVOLUTIO! (now I need a raised fist emoji )

Here you are!

How are you posting that? When I try to use an emoji the post preview shows up fine, but once I go to actually submit the post it throws a SQL error.

EDIT: I'm running Android 8.0.0, but I use the desktop/full version of the forums, not the mobile one.

Merlebird wrote:

masagin303 wrote:

shiroo56 wrote:We need to fight the ORDER! REVOLUTIO! (now I need a raised fist emoji )

Here you are!

How are you posting that? When I try to use an emoji the post preview shows up fine, but once I go to actually submit the post it throws a SQL error.

EDIT: I'm running Android 8.0.0, but I use the desktop/full version of the forums, not the mobile one.

Eagerly waiting for the answer

Kurama wrote:

Merlebird wrote:

masagin303 wrote:

shiroo56 wrote:We need to fight the ORDER! REVOLUTIO! (now I need a raised fist emoji )

Here you are!

How are you posting that? When I try to use an emoji the post preview shows up fine, but once I go to actually submit the post it throws a SQL error.

EDIT: I'm running Android 8.0.0, but I use the desktop/full version of the forums, not the mobile one.

Eagerly waiting for the answer

I use the mobile version most of the time on here unless I'm adding a gif. I have far to many issues with the desktop site. I'm on android 9.

macstrat wrote:

Kurama wrote:

Merlebird wrote:

masagin303 wrote:Here you are!

How are you posting that? When I try to use an emoji the post preview shows up fine, but once I go to actually submit the post it throws a SQL error.

EDIT: I'm running Android 8.0.0, but I use the desktop/full version of the forums, not the mobile one.

Eagerly waiting for the answer

I use the mobile version most of the time on here unless I'm adding a gif. I have far to many issues with the desktop site. I'm on android 9.

Emoji throw a SQL error for me on the mobile site too, apparently. It must be something that's changed between Android 8 and Android 9.

What's weird is I can quote magasin's post just fine, and even copy his emoji into my own post - - but I can't type emoji of my own directly into the post. Did encoding change between the two Android versions? Does it carry over via copy-paste?

I guess the easy fix is to just have magasin post a full list of currently supported Unicode emoji that I can copy-paste at my leisure [BACON]

I guess the easy fix is to just have magasin post a full list of currently supported Unicode emoji that I can copy-paste at my leisure [BACON]

Right on! Power to the people!

Merlebird wrote:

macstrat wrote:

Kurama wrote:

Merlebird wrote: How are you posting that? When I try to use an emoji the post preview shows up fine, but once I go to actually submit the post it throws a SQL error.

EDIT: I'm running Android 8.0.0, but I use the desktop/full version of the forums, not the mobile one.

Eagerly waiting for the answer

I use the mobile version most of the time on here unless I'm adding a gif. I have far to many issues with the desktop site. I'm on android 9.

Emoji throw a SQL error for me on the mobile site too, apparently. It must be something that's changed between Android 8 and Android 9.

What's weird is I can quote magasin's post just fine, and even copy his emoji into my own post - [emoji110] - but I can't type emoji of my own directly into the post. Did encoding change between the two Android versions? Does it carry over via copy-paste?

I guess the easy fix is to just have magasin post a full list of currently supported Unicode emoji that I can copy-paste at my leisure [BACON]

And that is why I am on an iPhone [emoji1307][emoji4][emoji23][emoji12][emoji1318]

The Ministry of Protection wanted to reassure all citizens that SQL errors for posting subversive emojis are not caused by our hackers.

Thirdway Industries wrote:The Ministry of Protection wanted to reassure all citizens that SQL errors for posting subversive emojis are not caused by our hackers.

Is this the same ministry that thinks David Ortiz was the wrong target of a murder attempt?

#dontgototheDR

I love this theme (and HATE the Order )

Well, here it is again from iPhone [emoji1535]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[emoji110]

Sent from my Galaxy 8 using Tapatalk

Edit: I got the SQL error when I posted a skin colour version of the emoji, but not when posting the standard yellow as above.

Since you guys are ̶s̶u̶b̶v̶e̶r̶s̶i̶v̶e̶ fan of the Revolutio, here is one of the Advertising cards included in that decks.

Also a layout of the backs

Those backs are . You’ve set our expectations high now after the Monoliths. Any cold foil on the Electus?

Brendt00 wrote:Those backs are . You’ve set our expectations high now after the Monoliths. Any cold foil on the Electus?

haha I guess I'll see that fist often here

Almost all features of Electus won't be revealed - this is for two reasons. The first one is that the Order is sneaky and never reveal its plans.
The other is that I am waiting responses from USPCC and Cartamundi for Electus (well, for the whole project - with the recent acquisition getting a decent quote it's a very complicated thing ).
I prefer reveal features I am 100% confident that will be made, so for now I won't announce cold foil on back.

Verified features are
> Foil on Box
> Premium Paper on box (which might be "really premium" )
> metallic inks
> Sealed and numbered
> Limited (1777)

Almost for sure more features will be unlocked (via stretch goals)

Man, I love the detail differences on the Revolutio back design! It depicts everything that's different from the other two Orders, just in a very subtle way.

Thirdway Industries wrote:

Brendt00 wrote:Those backs are . You’ve set our expectations high now after the Monoliths. Any cold foil on the Electus?

Almost all features of Electus won't be revealed - this is for two reasons. The first one is that the Order is sneaky and never reveal its plans.
>

I would trust your sneakiness over a lot of people’s transparency. It’s been a reliable habit, and seems to turn out incredibly in the end.