UnitedCardists.com - The forum for Cardistry, Magic, Custom Decks and All Things Playing Cards.

Magic Tapp wrote:

Conturbia wrote:The first part is false and the second is half false. There is a tracking code anyways, it's not full tracking, that's it.

I am sorry but if you cannot track the package to your door, the fact that it may be trackable some of the way is neither here nor there.

I also stand by my view that I would much rather pay more for shipping but get a deck from a better printer.

Conturbia wrote:

STLBluesNut wrote:27 or 30 buck just for a tuck change with the same cards inside? I live Gio and didnt even pay for the Gold Monolith because it was the same cards in the box but gilded even.

Is this for real?

Sent from my Galaxy 8 using Tapatalk

Not going to argue with you here. It's very difficult to follow the desires of everyone and still run a business. Would it be better if the color scheme and the back is different?

Yes that would be much better and more understandable if the cards inside were different.

I understand your position though and I hope they sell well. There is a market out there for decks with limited numbers. Some people will buy them because they are that limited. I am not one of those.

The problem with artificially limited items is just this, the run cost is so high due to the small number that it has to be passed on to the customer. However, that higher cost isn't providing any other value than a higher quantity run. Especially when it is the same cards in a different tuck.

Some people will really dig this and pay more. As a collector on a budget trying to collect efficiently, paying $27 for a deck that should still be in the $10 to $12 (imo. No foil or metallic inks on the cards. Only foil, no embossing on a matte tuck). From just a cost/feature perspective, yes it should be higher than the standard offering, but not double for a foil tuck.

I really like the tuck actually. I know it is bronze, not copper, but it looks copper and I love copper. I hope it sells well and many collectors enjoy it.

Sent from my Galaxy 8 using Tapatalk

Magic Tapp wrote:

Magic Tapp wrote:

Conturbia wrote:The first part is false and the second is half false. There is a tracking code anyways, it's not full tracking, that's it.

I am sorry but if you cannot track the package to your door, the fact that it may be trackable some of the way is neither here nor there.

I also stand by my view that I would much rather pay more for shipping but get a deck from a better printer.

Ok, don't want to argue. Your previous sentence sounded to me more like "they will attach the decks to pidgeons and you have to pray for them to arrive if the shipping fee is cheap" and it's actually a little bit different. I'm always bugged by the shippings in Kicstarter, because they have to be embedded in the reward. But I noticed that some creators leave the shipping outside KS (even if this is probably against their rules?) and make the backer pay a more precise amount after the campaign. I don't know how the backers would react to this.

STLBluesNut wrote:

Conturbia wrote:

STLBluesNut wrote: I hope it sells well and many collectors enjoy it.

Sent from my Galaxy 8 using Tapatalk

It's doing pretty good actually. By the way, were you a backer of the previous Equality // Justice that failed to reach the goal? (we were printing with USPCC in that case)

Now Integrity has its own card variation and a standard tuck case for everyone who missed the L.E.

Not all the images on the campaign are updated, but I want to share here the new back and the "family photo"

I can't find how much to add-on for this deck...?

vasta41 wrote:I can't find how much to add-on for this deck...?

I'm guessing $11 like Equality & Justice.

vasta41 wrote:I can't find how much to add-on for this deck...?

Yes, sorry, I forgot to update the add-ons table. It's like the others for the deck and the brick Thanks!

Full Deck Scans:
Equality - https://www.flickr.com/photos/167981955 ... 1116287836" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Justice - https://www.flickr.com/photos/167981955 ... 1119445133" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;