Re: Dance of death
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 4:22 pm
Good afternoon, to all forum users. Finished the layout of the sheet. So it will look. As you can see, 3 cards will be from the new deck.
The forum for Cardistry, Magic, Custom Decks and All Things Playing Cards.
https://www.unitedcardists.org/
Thank. We are still working on the texts. As for the NPCC I use the resources that I have in the country. My first experience, I do not want to promise what I do not knowsms69x wrote:I took a look at the project page and the main advice I can give you is to ask to a native english speaker to review it. It is very confusing and some texts doesn't make sense at all, this may throw away some possible supporters.
I like the deck very much, but being it printed by NPCC makes it an easy pass.
Best of lucks though.
Thank))))macstrat wrote:Backed. Im really looking forward to this deck.
Thank)))) We honestly tried !!!)))Eric Lee wrote:I'm in too. This is something different in a good way for me.
I agree with you, there are flaws. you can understand me ... The first experience.))))))))))Decknowledgy wrote:Looking at the four suits, the clubs look a bit out of place while the other three suits have a border. If the spades were the clubs enclosed in a thin outline, then why not take the hearts as also a bordered version of the red suits and strip the diamond of its outer linework? Just a thought on balance
Thank you very much !!!))) It was a big job for me !!! I think my guys with the girls on the cards will incline you to support !!!!))))) Good day !!)))Jocu wrote:I think this is a solid first campaign. The art is great and playing it safe by using a local supplier is probably the smart way to go, even if the handling won’t be great. The shipping is very reasonable when combined with the deck cost. I still think you should try contacting Cartamundi - I think it’d be an easy pledge from me if I knew the handling would be perfect. I use my cards after all, so handling is the top consideration for me usually.
You’ve obviously put a lot of effort into reworking it to get it just right based on community feedback too. For well over a year no less. That’s great!
I’m considering backing. Just got to sit on it for a few days
SerKoN wrote:Thanks to all the patrons. Today I received a pilot deck of cards. I was worried about how they would look alive. 270gsm promotional quality. But it was necessary to print to see what we face. Thanks a lot to all those who advised to make a "Кant", this really saved the deck. Making it playable !!
SerKoN wrote:Thanks to all the patrons. Today I received a pilot deck of cards. I was worried about how they would look alive. 270gsm promotional quality. But it was necessary to print to see what we face. Thanks a lot to all those who advised to make a "Кant", this really saved the deck. Making it playable !!
I decided to still contact Cartamundi to study their conditions for printing and sending. Perhaps the most important issue for me is sending, to the patrons of the cards.Jocu wrote:I think this is a solid first campaign. The art is great and playing it safe by using a local supplier is probably the smart way to go, even if the handling won’t be great. The shipping is very reasonable when combined with the deck cost. I still think you should try contacting Cartamundi - I think it’d be an easy pledge from me if I knew the handling would be perfect. I use my cards after all, so handling is the top consideration for me usually.
You’ve obviously put a lot of effort into reworking it to get it just right based on community feedback too. For well over a year no less. That’s great!
I’m considering backing. Just got to sit on it for a few days
SerKoN wrote:I decided to still contact Cartamundi to study their conditions for printing and sending. Perhaps the most important issue for me is sending, to the patrons of the cards.Jocu wrote:I think this is a solid first campaign. The art is great and playing it safe by using a local supplier is probably the smart way to go, even if the handling won’t be great. The shipping is very reasonable when combined with the deck cost. I still think you should try contacting Cartamundi - I think it’d be an easy pledge from me if I knew the handling would be perfect. I use my cards after all, so handling is the top consideration for me usually.
You’ve obviously put a lot of effort into reworking it to get it just right based on community feedback too. For well over a year no less. That’s great!
I’m considering backing. Just got to sit on it for a few days
Thank you very much for the tips and advice !!! For me, this is a very important step !!! and very important !!! I think that God through you gives me the right direction !!!Jocu wrote:SerKoN wrote:I decided to still contact Cartamundi to study their conditions for printing and sending. Perhaps the most important issue for me is sending, to the patrons of the cards.Jocu wrote:I think this is a solid first campaign. The art is great and playing it safe by using a local supplier is probably the smart way to go, even if the handling won’t be great. The shipping is very reasonable when combined with the deck cost. I still think you should try contacting Cartamundi - I think it’d be an easy pledge from me if I knew the handling would be perfect. I use my cards after all, so handling is the top consideration for me usually.
You’ve obviously put a lot of effort into reworking it to get it just right based on community feedback too. For well over a year no less. That’s great!
I’m considering backing. Just got to sit on it for a few days
Great! That makes sense. If you’re worried about fulfilment I recommend contacting Gamblers Warehouse in the US. You can get Cartamundi to ship directly to them and they’ll post to all your backers. Their costs are very reasonable and they have a good reputation. It will actually end up cheaper for you to shop to Europe from their than the Ukraine for many EU places strangely! And certainly less work for you.
Thank you so much for the very necessary advice. I'll do it. By voting in updates. Choosing between Kartamundi, LPСС and MPСEric Lee wrote:I would go with LPCC first but if MPC is really more affordable, I would strongly recommend using MPC's new "Linen Air" finish which they recently developed with their Chao decks. It's really nice and smooth handling. I would argue that the finish puts MPC on par with LPCC and EPCC now. You can find out the details of that here:
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/ma ... -of-playin" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;..
However, please let your backers know as soon as possible . You may want to let the backers decide which printer to use in a survey so that it's clear that the majority of backers chose that printer and not you forcing the chance.
Sorry for my English, or rather its complete absence)) If I understood correctly, did you decide to support my project? If yes, thanks a lot !!!)))rousselle wrote:As long as the finish is linen (or similar) and not smooth, I'll climb on board.
Thanks you!! Yes, the nuances of the nuances. But as they say: The road will be mastered by going))) So I will find out all these nuances.hsbc wrote:He means that he will support your project if the finish is linen (not smooth)